|DENTAL SCIENCE - CASE REPORT
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 5 | Page : 314-318
Gnathological splint therapy in temporomandibular joint disorder
K Gnanashanmugham, B Saravanan, MR Sukumar, T Faisal Tajir
Department of Orthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
|Date of Submission||31-Oct-2014|
|Date of Decision||31-Oct-2014|
|Date of Acceptance||09-Nov-2014|
|Date of Web Publication||30-Apr-2015|
Dr. K Gnanashanmugham
Department of Orthodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) forms an integral functional part of stomatognathic system. Position, shape, structure and function of teeth have an influence on the proper functioning and health of TMJ. But a problem associated with TMJ is often neglected, and treatment for it is mostly restricted to palliative therapy. A proper understanding of the underlying cause of temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is necessary to device a proper treatment plan. Etiology of TMDs varies from idiopathic reasons to systemic disorders. The option of Gnathological splint is a conservative, safe and an effective mode of therapy for TMDs caused by occlusal discrepancies (fulcrum/interferences). This article presents a case report of a patient with TMD caused by occlusal discrepancy
Keywords: Centric occlusion, centric relation, gnathological splint, measures condylar distance, Roth power centric bite, temporomandibular joint disorders
|How to cite this article:|
Gnanashanmugham K, Saravanan B, Sukumar M R, Tajir T F. Gnathological splint therapy in temporomandibular joint disorder. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7, Suppl S1:314-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Gnanashanmugham K, Saravanan B, Sukumar M R, Tajir T F. Gnathological splint therapy in temporomandibular joint disorder. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2022 Dec 6];7, Suppl S1:314-8. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2015/7/5/314/155972
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders refer to a poorly understood set of complex conditions, manifested by pain in the areas of the jaw and associated muscles and limitations in the ability to make the normal functions like phonation, facial expression, mastication and deglutition. Etiology of temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) varies from idiopathic reason to systemic disorders.  Treatment for TMD's varies widely depending on their etiology. The option of gnathological splint is a conservative, safe and an effective mode of therapy for TMDs caused by occlusal discrepancies (fulcrum/interferences). , This article presents a case report of a patient with TMD caused by occlusal discrepancy.
| Case Report|| |
A 27-year-old male patient reported to the department of orthodontics with a chief complaint of pain in the jaw joint region on both sides for the past 3 months. Patient also revealed frequent episodes of headache and neck stiffness [Figure 1]a-c.
On examination, it was noted that the patient had bilateral initial opening clicks, deviation of the mandible toward right on opening and tenderness on palpation of masticatory muscles.
Joint mapping (Rocabado) indicated bilateral inflammation of the retrodiscal tissues (tenderness on palpation of the posterior joint space). 
On the manipulation to centric relation (CR), the interference/Fulcrum was spotted on the maxillary left 2 nd molar region.  To avoid this interference the patient habitually shifts the mandible to the right, distracting the condyles leading to a sequence of events [Chart 1], resulting in TMD. 
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-at the mid condylar section [Figure 2] - it was observed that there was an increase in joint space in the superior aspect indicating a downward displacement of the condyle from its optimal position. 
Measures condylar distance interpretation
Downward displacement of the condyle by 2.9 mm [Figure 3].
|Figure 3: Measures condyle displacement (MCD) Interpretation before splint therapy (a) transverse recording (b) left condyle (c) right condyle|
Click here to view
Bilateral downward distraction of condyles with associated anterior disc displacement with reduction.
Gnathological splint therapy for 6-8 months. 
| Fabrication of Gnathological Splint|| |
Maxillary and mandibular impressions were taken using an irreversible hydrocolloid in sterilized metal rim-lock trays. All impressions were disinfected for 5 min with ioda-5, then rinsed with water and sprayed with a debubblizing surfactant before being poured with Type 4 Gypsum.
Face-bow transfer records were taken using the AD2 face-bow Advanved Dental Designs, USA. It records the relationship of the maxilla to the cranium [Figure 4]a and b. 
Centric relation bite
Centric relation bite (Roth power centric) [Figure 5] was taken with Delar bite registration wax in two sections, one in the anterior region and the other in the posterior region. , The patient was seated in the dental chair reclined at an angle of 45° to the floor. To take the anterior section, the wax (2-3 layer thickness) was cut in a shape and appropriate size to register from canine to canine. The wax was then heated until soft in a water bath at 138°F. The wax bite was then placed in the patient's mouth extending from canine to canine. The patient's mandible was then manipulated (to CR) to make an interocclusal registration in the anterior section. The patient was then instructed to close until the posterior teeth were discluded approximately 2 mm in the area of the second molars. While in the closed position, an air syringe was used to begin the cooling process. The anterior record was then removed, and stored in chilled water.
The posterior section was trimmed wide enough to include the first molar and second bicuspid teeth extended across the arch. The wax was then softened and placed on the maxillary posterior teeth. With the posterior section in place, the chilled anterior portion was placed back in position again. The patient was then guided in the same manner to close into the hardened anterior segment and asked to bite as firmly as possible and hold it. This allowed the patient's musculature to aid in seating the condyle in CR position. Both the bites were then removed and stored in chilled water.
With the help of face-bow transfer record, the maxillary model is mounted to the articulator with the mounting plate and mounting plaster [Figure 6]. Sufficient time is allowed for the plaster to set. The incisal guide pin is raised by 3 mm. To mount the lower model, the articulator is inverted, the centric wax bites are placed on the maxillary model, and the mandibular model is placed into the wax. A mounting plate is fastened to the lower member of the articulator, and the mandibular model is mounted, using mounting plaster or dental stone.
Splint fabrication and trimming
Splint was fabricated with cold cure acrylic resin at a position with 3 mm clearance from the fulcrum. The splint was then allowed to set for sufficient time. With the splint still not removed from the articulator, initial trimming was done to establish centric stops and mutually protected functional occlusal pattern. The splint later was adjusted in the patient's mouth to do further trimming to establish the same [Figure 7]. The patient was advised to wear the splint full time.
Patient was recalled every month, and the splint was checked for centric stops and mutually protected occlusal pattern each time.  The mandible was checked and guided to centric, and it was noted that each time, the mandible exhibited lesser resistance indicating the reduction in muscle stiffness due to deprogramming. 
At the end of 8 months of splint therapy, the patient reported with a:
- A drastic reduction of pain in the TMJ region
- Reduction in the frequency and severity of headache. ,
On examination after 8 months of splint therapy
- Bilateral clicks were not seen
- No tenderness or pain in the region of muscles of mastication
- No deviation in mouth opening
- Most importantly, patient had the occlusal contact only in the fulcrum/interference point [Figure 8].
Postsplint cone-beam computed tomography findings
Indicated the correction of condylar Distraction as the position, and joint space were found normal [Figure 9]. 
Postsplint measures condylar distance findings
Mandibular position indicator reading showed change in condylar position in support of the CBCT findings.
| Discussion|| |
The etiology of TMDs can be unifactorial or multifactorial, and the treatment for it depends on the etiological factor (s). One of the most common causes of TMDs is occlusal discrepancies, and this is one area where the treatment option has been tried and tested to success to some extent. The patient had TMD due to a fulcrum in the maxillary left second molar region. The proprioceptive sense of the patient detects this interference as inconvenience and forced the patient to search for a more convenient position with maximum occlusal contacts in spite of one. In doing so, the patient automatically distracted the condyle to a musculoskeletally unstable position. , At this habitual occlusal position, the patient is able to make more occlusal contacts but at the cost of the health of the TMJ and muscles of mastication. If left unattended the patient ends up in TMD with derangement of condyle disc assembly.  The gnathological splint was given to the patient to deprogram the muscles from this distracted position and to move the condyle to a more optimal and stable position. After 8 months of splint therapy, the patient exhibited lack of symptoms and the records taken at this time indicated the correction of condylar position.
Now the challenge lies in establishing a proper occlusion by orthodontic treatment in accordance with the optimal condylar position achieved by splint therapy.  A proper orthodontic diagnosis should be made at this stage when the condyles are seated in centric. In other words, the objective should be to establish centric occlusion (CO) in CR position (CR = CO). 
| Conclusion|| |
Temporomandibular joint forms an integral functional part of stomatognathic system. Position, shape, structure and function of teeth have an influence on the proper functioning and health of TMJ. It becomes important thus when the position and occlusion are changed for treatment, it is imperative to check for joint's health and joint position and even more important to establish the occlusion in optimal condylar position. As evident from this case, the orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning has changed drastically when the condyles are positioned in CR position. Diagnosis and treatment planning done at this optimal position helps in achieving proper orthodontic treatment results, which will remain stable and in harmony with healthy TMJ.
| References|| |
Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Solberg WK. Temporomandibular disorders. Part II: Occlusal factors associated with temporomandibular joint tenderness and dysfunction. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:363-7.
Reynders RM. Orthodontics and temporomandibular disorders: A review of the literature (1966-1988). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:463-71.
Rendell JK, Norton LA, Gay T. Orthodontic treatment and temporomandibular joint disorders. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:84-7.
Roth RH. The maintenance system and occlusal dynamics. Dent Clin North Am 1976;20:761-88.
Sadowsky C, Polson AM. Temporomandibular disorders and functional occlusion after orthodontic treatment: Results of two long-term studies. Am J Orthod 1984;86:386-90.
Nielsen L, Melsen B, Terp S. TMJ function and the effects on the masticatory system on 14-16-year-old Danish children in relation to orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1990;12:254-62.
Ikeda K, Kawamura A. Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:495-501.
Okeson J. Orthodontics Current Principles and Techniques. 4 th
ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005. p. 333.
Dawson PE. New definition for relating occlusion to varying conditions of the temporomandibular joint. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:619-27.
Gilboe DB. Centric relation as the treatment position. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:685-9.
Ramfjord S, Ash M. Occlusion. 2 nd
ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1971. p. 95.
Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L. Progressive mandibular retrusion-idiopathic condylar resorption. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:117-27.
Mongini F. Condylar remodeling after occlusal therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:568-77.
Weinberg LA. Role of condylar position in TMJ dysfunction-pain syndrome. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:636-43.
Utt TW, Meyers CE Jr, Wierzba TF, Hondrum SO. A three-dimensional comparison of condylar position changes between centric relation and centric occlusion using the mandibular position indicator. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:298-308.
Posselt W. The Physiology of Occlusion and Rehabilitation. 2 nd
ed. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication; 1968. p. 25-64.
Lundeen HC, Gibbs CH. The Function of Teeth. USA: L and G Publishers LLC; 2005. p. 33-5.
Nebbe B, Major PW. Prevalence of TMJ disc displacement in a pre-orthodontic adolescent sample. Angle Orthod 2000;70:454-63.
Legrell PE, Isberg A. Mandibular length and midline asymmetry after experimentally induced temporomandibular joint disk displacement in rabbits. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:247-53.
Bryndahl F, Eriksson L, Legrell PE, Isberg A. Bilateral TMJ disk displacement induces mandibular retrognathia. J Dent Res 2006;85:1118-23.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9]