|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 436-443
Knowledge of the use of herbal medicines among community pharmacists and reporting their adverse drug reactions
Mehak Tahir1, Dinesh Kumar Upadhyay1, Muhammad Zahid Iqbal1, Sawri Rajan2, Muhammad Shahid Iqbal3, Ahmed A Albassam3
1 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia
2 Head of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, AIMST University, Bedong, Kedah, Malaysia
3 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-kharj, Saudi Arabia
|Date of Submission||10-Apr-2020|
|Date of Decision||15-May-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||03-Jun-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||08-Oct-2020|
Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj 11942, Riyadh
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Introduction: Community pharmacist’s knowledge about the uses of herbal medicines and its adverse drug reactions reporting can contribute in better therapeutic outcomes and patient safety. Objectives: To evaluate community pharmacists’ knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its adverse drug reactions reporting in Kedah state, Malaysia. Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among 103 pharmacists from 74 different community pharmacies to assess their knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its adverse drug reaction reporting by using a pre-validate knowledge questionnaire consisting of 12 questions related to it. The pharmacists’ responses were measured at a 3-point Likert scale (Poor=1, Moderate=2, and Good=3) and data was entered in SPSS version 22. The minimum and maximum possible scores for knowledge questionnaires were 12 and 36 respectively. Quantitative data was analyzed by using One Way ANOVA and Paired t-test whereas Chi-square and Fisher exact test were used for qualitative data analysis. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the analyses. Results: About 92% of the pharmacist had good knowledge regarding the use of herbal medicines and its adverse drug reaction reporting with a mean knowledge score of 32.88±3.16. One-way ANOVA determined a significant difference of employment setting (p<0.043) and years of experience (<0.008) with mean knowledge scores of Pharmacists. Pharmacists’ knowledge was significantly associated with their years of experience with the Chi-square test. Conclusion: Pharmacists exhibit good knowledge regarding the use of herbal medicines and its adverse drug reaction reporting. However, with an increasing trend of herbal medicine use and its adverse drug reaction reporting it recalls the empowerment of experienced pharmacists with training programs in this area for better clinical outcomes.
Keywords: Adverse drug reactions, herbal medicine, knowledge, pharmacists
|How to cite this article:|
Tahir M, Upadhyay DK, Iqbal MZ, Rajan S, Iqbal MS, Albassam AA. Knowledge of the use of herbal medicines among community pharmacists and reporting their adverse drug reactions. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2020;12:436-43
|How to cite this URL:|
Tahir M, Upadhyay DK, Iqbal MZ, Rajan S, Iqbal MS, Albassam AA. Knowledge of the use of herbal medicines among community pharmacists and reporting their adverse drug reactions. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Nov 28];12:436-43. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2020/12/4/436/297478
| Introduction|| |
Herbal medicines are intended to be used for medicinal and therapeutic purposes. People have a strong belief in the healing power of natural herbs since ancient times, thus they have been practicing the use of herbs to treat or prevent diseases. The World Health Organization reported that 80% of the total population of Africa uses traditional medicines for primary treatment of ailments. Similarly, in China, 30–50% of the total therapeutic consumptions belongs to traditional herbal medicines. Additionally, in several industrialized countries, the use of herbal products is rapidly progressing over time.
According to the global industrial analyst, the market of herbal medicines was more than US$107 billion by the year 2017 and is growing steadily because of an increasing number of consumers. For example, among the German population, there is a 90% use of natural remedies in their lifestyle and daily routine. Similarly, in the United States, herbal medicine has remarkably gained popularity in recent years. One national survey reported that due to an extensive use of herbal medicines in the United States, it has become a second most common method of alternative therapy in terms of treating illness of various disorders by one-quarter of the adult population.,
In the case of Malaysia, the use of herbal medicine is incredibly increasing. It is estimated that during the past few years (2013–2019) in Malaysia, the annual sale of herbal medicines has been rapidly increased from RM10 billion (US$2.44 billion) in 2008 to RM32 billion (US$7.8 billion) by 2020. The majority of the Malaysian population use herbal medicines for treating their primary illnesses without even consulting with the doctor or pharmacist, based on their strong beliefs and personal experiences., Currently, herbal medicines are prepared as over-the-counter drugs and in different pharmaceutical dosage forms such as syrups, capsules, and extracts. Commonly available herbal dosage forms include decoctions, teas, tinctures, glycerites, oxymels, soaps, tablets, capsules, creams, and ointments.,
It has been well observed that patients consider herbal medicines are safer than conventional medicines. This misconception is very common among patients who are hesitant to discuss the matter with their doctors or pharmacists. They ignore the fact that there is a great variation in the concentration of active ingredients within the raw plants and their species. However, globally, there are some untested or unapproved drugs available in the market as herbal medicines, thus leading to adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Medicines have been known to produce a preferred therapeutic outcome but also have the likelihood of causing unwanted adverse effects. According to the WHO, ADR is an unnecessary, unintended effect of any medicine that occurs during clinical use of the drug. ADRs affect the quality of life of a patient and considered as the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.
In a healthcare system, the pharmacist is considered as the last member of the healthcare team who dispenses the medicine(s) and also responsible for the safety of the patients. Herbal medicine is mostly received by the patient from the pharmacist. It could be on-demand and in adjunct with other medicines. The pharmacist must know the interactions between allopathic medicines and herbal medicines, contraindication of a drug during the use of another drug, adverse reaction of herbal medicines, and its contraindication in certain medical conditions. It is the moral duty of pharmacists to provide care and safety to patients taking medicines.
Because of the large and growing use of naturally derived substances all over the world, the assessment of community pharmacists’ knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its adverse reactions is much needed. Therefore, the present study has been conducted to assess the community pharmacists’ knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported in Kedah, Malaysia where none of the studies has been focused on this aspect.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Study design, location, and time frame
A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among 103 community pharmacists working at 74 community pharmacies to evaluate their knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported in Kedah, Malaysia. Data were collected for 3 months (March 2018–May 2018).
Study population, sample size, sampling technique, and ethical approval
The current study was conducted among pharmacists practicing at different community pharmacies in Kedah. The study intended to recruit all pharmacists practicing at community pharmacies. The sample size for the present study was calculated based on the number of community pharmacies outlets available in the state of Kedah by using modified Cochran formula for sample size calculation at 95% confidence level, 5% margin of error, and response distribution of 50%. The final targeted sample size of the present study was 74 pharmacies located in Kedah, Malaysia.
where n0 = (Z2 × pq/e2), e is the desired level of precision (i.e., the margin of error 0.05), p is the proportion of the population, q is 1 − p, and N is the population size.
Ethical approval was obtained from the AIMST University Human Ethics Committee (Ref No: AUHEC/FOP/2018/33) to conduct the study.
Consent from study participants
The consent form was prepared and distributed to the study population by the researcher and written permission was obtained from them before participating in this study. The participants of this study were assured about the confidentiality of their personal data and identity throughout the research.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Registered pharmacists working at community pharmacies located in various districts of Kedah were included in this study. However, hospital pharmacists, provisional registered pharmacists, and pharmacists who have provided the incomplete survey forms were excluded from the study.
Formulation of knowledge questionnaire about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs
The study was conducted by using a prevalidated and well-structured questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge of pharmacists regarding the use of herbal medicine and its ADRs reported. An extensive literature review was conducted targeting the area of research interest, and key areas were identified to formulate the questionnaire related to the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported by pharmacists., The structured questionnaire was then validated by the experts in the field of clinical research and herbal medicines. Mostly questions were related to indications, side effects, contraindication, and reporting of ADR of herbal medicines. A total of 12 questions were formulated for evaluating the knowledge of pharmacists about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs.
Scoring of knowledge questions
Questions related to knowledge were measured on a three-point Likert scale and further classified based on Bloom’s cutoff point criteria into poor, moderate, and good knowledge. Score 01 was given to poor knowledge, 02 was given to moderate knowledge, and 03 was given to good knowledge. The minimum and maximum scores in the knowledge domain were 12 and 36, respectively.
Validation of knowledge questionnaire
The face and content validity of the questionnaire was performed by different healthcare professionals and experts from the medical center and specialist center of International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and academic clinical pharmacists of Faculty of Pharmacy, AIMST University. A pilot study was conducted among 10 community pharmacists from different pharmacies to identify the questions suitability and its better understanding of the participants. The data obtained from the pilot study were entered into SPSS is Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. in the United States and Cronbach α value was determined to check the questionnaire reliability. The Cronbach α value for the knowledge questionnaire was 0.703.
Data collection and statistical analysis
A prevalidated questionnaire was distributed to the pharmacists practicing at community pharmacies in Kedah, Malaysia and their responses were taken on the spot in order to avoid response biasness. Data obtained from the respondents were entered into SPSS version 22, and descriptive analysis was performed to determine the frequency, percentages, mean, and standard deviation of quantitative data. The data distribution pattern was determined on the basis of the assumptions to find whether the data were normally distributed. In case of normally distributed data, parametric tests, such as independent t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, were used, whereas not normally distributed data were analyzed using nonparametric tests such as χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant for all the analyses.
| Results|| |
Of 103 pharmacist participants, female (59 [57.3%]) participants were more in number than male (44 [42.7%]). The majority of them were in the age group of 20–25 years (38 [36.9%]) with a minimum education level of Bachelor of Pharmacy (90 [87.4%]). Most of the respondents were having a work experience of 1–5 years (91 [88.3%]) with a full-time job (87 [84.5%]). The majority of the community pharmacies (62 [60.2%]) had 10–20% of herbal products. Other demographic characteristics of the pharmacists have been mentioned in [Table 1].
Comparison of overall pharmacists’ knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported
Overall pharmacists’ knowledge was categorized based on Bloom’s cutoff point into poor, moderate, and good. A significant difference was found between the years of experience of pharmacists and their knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported [Table 2].
|Table 2: Comparison of overall pharmacists’ knowledge with their demographic variables|
Click here to view
Pharmacists’ knowledge mean scores about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported
Descriptive analysis was used to determine the pharmacists’ knowledge mean scores and standard deviation. One-way ANOVA test identified a significant difference in pharmacists’ knowledge scores with their employment setting and the years of experience as community pharmacists [Table 3].
|Table 3: Pharmacists’ knowledge mean scores about herbal medicines and its ADRs reported|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
In a healthcare system, a pharmacist is the first person accessible to patients during the dispensing of medicine. Based on ethnicity, the current study showed a nonsignificant difference and the results from different ethnic groups were almost similar. Earlier performed studies in Asian countries have also exhibited the same results that no significant difference was found based on ethnicity., Asian countries always showed great acceptance of using herbal medicines for their minor to major illnesses than the Western countries., The current study showed that age does not affect pharmacists’ knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and their ADRs. The concepts of knowledge will remain the same in older ages as well. Studies conducted in the past are also indicative of the same results and found no significant difference based on the age group.,
The impact of religion has always been one of the most contrasting parameters to evaluate the knowledge of the participants. In the current study, no significant difference was found in knowledge based on religion. In accordance with the current study, Muslims were found to be more knowledgeable about herbal and complementary medicines among the similar religious groups. Educational background plays an important role in the estimation of knowledge of any population, and it is a well-known fact that an increase in educational level will bring a deeper knowledge; but unfortunately in the present study, no significant difference was found among respondents with the increase in their educational background. A similar study reported that pharmacists with previous continuing education were found to be more knowledgeable about herbal medicines. There is a gap in postgraduate training of pharmacist in the field of herbal medicine which is supported by the study conducted in Southwest Nigeria, which reported that 72% of community pharmacists did not receive any postgraduate training about herbal medicine which proved that there is no impact of the increase in their educational level on their knowledge. Due to an incredible increase in the use of herbal medicines, it is noted that there is a greater need for reliable resources and education training programs in this area. Years of working experience and knowledge of pharmacists related to herbal medicines were found significant in the present study. On the basis of years of experience, the current study highlighted that pharmacists with an increase in the years of experience 1–5 years (n = 86, 94.5%), 6–10 years (n = 5, 71.4%), 11–15 years (n = 2, 71.4%), and more than 15 years (n = 2, 66.7%) were having a corresponding increase in the knowledge. It seems pharmacists gain more exposure to herbal medicines over time. Previous studies conducted in different parts of the world also highlighted a significant association of years of experience with the knowledge, where knowledge increased with an increase in the years of working experience.,, In contrast, a study conducted in northwest Ethiopia showed the opposite results where less experienced pharmacists were found to be more knowledgeable than the more experienced pharmacists.
The current study also evaluated the knowledge of pharmacists on the basis of the location of pharmacy in areas such as urban, suburban, and rural. No significant association was observed between the location of the pharmacy and the knowledge of pharmacists. Pharmacists working in rural areas were found to have more knowledge than those working in urban areas, and it is maybe due to the high use of herbal medicines in such areas. In accordance with the present study, other studies highlighted the use of herbal medicine in rural areas due to cultural factor that promotes the use of herbs because people living in rural areas have a strong belief in herbal medicines to cure their diseases., A study conducted in India also supported the use of herbal medicines by the rural population due to the nonavailability of modern medicines in a vast section of the population. Also due to lack of staff, medical facilities, and inadequate supply of medicines, rural populations are mostly dependent on natural products.
The present study demonstrated that herbal medicines are greatly used by the local population as well as by community pharmacists in Kedah, Malaysia. This describes an increasing trend of using herbal medicines by the community to treat their minor to major illnesses. However, due to this massive practice without proper evidence, negligence is being observed with the reporting of ADRs caused by herbal medicines. Most of the respondents assumed that herbal medicines are safer to use and have less or no side effects. The majority of the pharmacists did not receive any additional training about the use of herbal medicines despite having an incredibly increasing amount of use by the community in Malaysia. Because herbal medicines are not properly regulated by the Drug Control Authority Malaysia, there is a great concern for its evaluation regarding quality, efficacy, and safety of using herbal medicines. The majority of the respondents in the present study claimed to have good knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs and did not show any significant association between gender, age group, employment status, location of the pharmacy, and percentages of known herbal products available in the pharmacy. A significant difference was found only within the years of experience in the present study. Previous studies also showed similar results with years of experience and knowledge of pharmacists.,
| Conclusions|| |
The present study identified the massive utilization of herbal medicines by community pharmacists in Malaysia and the established good knowledge about the use of herbal medicines and its ADRs reported. Thus, the findings of the present study concluded that pharmacists are responsible in providing optimal care and counseling to the patients who use herbal medicines as well as responsible for reporting ADRs caused by herbal products, and this can be achieved by the development of educational and training programs for practicing pharmacists paying attention to safety, efficacy, reporting, and rational use of herbal medicines.
The authors would like to thank the Deanship of Scientific Research at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia for the support in the publication of this manuscript. The authors would also like to express their sincere gratitude to all of the participants involved in this study in any capacity.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Duraz AY, Khan SA Knowledge, attitudes and awareness of community pharmacists towards the use of herbal medicines in muscat region. Oman Med J 2011;26:451-3.
Ayyanar M, Ignacimuthu S Herbal medicines for wound healing among tribal people in southern India: Ethnobotanical and scientific evidences. Int J Appl Res Nat Prod 2009;2:29-42.
Kala CP, Dhyani PP, Sajwan BS Developing the medicinal plants sector in northern India: Challenges and opportunities. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 2006;2:32.
Bent S Herbal medicine in the United States: Review of efficacy, safety, and regulation: Grand rounds at university of California, San Francisco medical center. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:854-9.
Hailemeskel B, Habte A, Fullas F, Al-Matari RA A survey on the use of complementary and alternative medicine among Ethiopian immigrants in the USA. J Complement Med Alt Healthcare 2017;1:555568.
Ahmad S, Othman N Strategic planning, issues, prospects and the future of the Malaysian herbal industry. Int J Acad Res Account Financ Manag Sci 2013;3:91-102.
Elkalmi RM, Hassali MA, Ibrahim MI, Widodo RT, Efan QM, Hadi MA Pharmacy students’ knowledge and perceptions about pharmacovigilance in Malaysian public universities. Am J Pharm Educ 2011;75:96.
Kim Sooi L, Lean Keng S Herbal medicines: Malaysian women’s knowledge and practice. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013;2013:438139.
Lynch N, Berry D Differences in perceived risks and benefits of herbal, over-the-counter conventional, and prescribed conventional, medicines, and the implications of this for the safe and effective use of herbal products. Complement Ther Med 2007;15:84-91.
Kumadoh D, Ofori-Kwakye K Dosage forms of herbal medicinal products and their stability considerations—an overview. J Crit Rev 2017;4.
Pal SK, Shukla Y Herbal medicine: Current status and the future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2003;4:281-8.
Barnes J Quality, efficacy and safety of complementary medicines: Fashions, facts and the future. Part II: Efficacy and safety. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003;55:331-40.
Schulz V, Hänsel R, Tyler VE Rational phytotherapy: A physician’s guide to herbal medicine. Psychology Press. 4th ed. 2001. Springer Publishing (Book).
Jeon N, Staley B, Johns T, Lipori GP, Brumback B, Segal R, et al
. Identifying and characterizing preventable adverse drug events for prioritizing pharmacist intervention in hospitals. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2017;74:1774-83.
Poon EG, Cina JL, Churchill W, Patel N, Featherstone E, Rothschild JM, et al
. Medication dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events before and after implementing bar code technology in the pharmacy. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:426-34.
De Winter S, Spriet I, Indevuyst C, Vanbrabant P, Desruelles D, Sabbe M, et al
. Pharmacist-versus physician-acquired medication history: A prospective study at the emergency department. BMJ Qual Saf 2010;19:371-5.
Chang ZG, Kennedy DT, Holdford DA, Small RE Pharmacists’ knowledge and attitudes toward herbal medicine. Ann Pharmacother 2000;34:710-5.
Sweileh W, Arrah EMA, Taha ASA, Sawalha AF, Salah OA, Jamous RM, et al
. Dispensing practices, attitudes and knowledge of pharmacists towards herbal products in Palestine. Ibnosina J Med Biomed Sci 2013;5:123-30. [Full text]
Al-Arifi MN Availability and needs of herbal medicinal information resources at community pharmacy, Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J 2013;21:351-60.
Fahmy SA, Abdu S, Abuelkhair M Pharmacists’ attitude, perceptions and knowledge towards the use of herbal products in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2010;8:109-15.
Abahussain NA, Abahussain EA, Al-Oumi FM Pharmacists’ attitudes and awareness towards the use and safety of herbs in Kuwait. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2007;5:125-9.
Lim N, Kim EK, Kim H, Yang E, Lee SM Individual and work-related factors influencing burnout of mental health professionals: A meta-analysis. J Employ Couns 2010;47:86-96.
Adisa R, Fakeye T Assessment of the knowledge of community pharmacists regarding common phytopharmaceuticals sold in south western Nigeria. Trop J Pharmaceut Res 2006;5:619-25.
Fakeye TO, Adisa R, Musa IE Attitude and use of herbal medicines among pregnant women in Nigeria. BMC Complement Altern Med 2009;9:53.
Oshikoya KA, Oreagba IA, Ogunleye OO, Oluwa R, Senbanjo IO, Olayemi SO Herbal medicines supplied by community pharmacies in Lagos, Nigeria: Pharmacists’ knowledge. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2013;11:219-27.
Jayaraj P Regulation of traditional and complementary medicinal products in Malaysia. Int J Green Pharm2010;4:10-14.
Shraim NY, Shawahna R, Sorady MA, Aiesh BM, Alashqar GS, Jitan RI, et al
. Community pharmacists’ knowledge, practices and beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine in palestine: A cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017;17:429.
Kwan D, Boon HS, Hirschkorn K, Welsh S, Jurgens T, Eccott L, et al
. Exploring consumer and pharmacist views on the professional role of the pharmacist with respect to natural health products: A study of focus groups. BMC Complement Altern Med 2008;8:40.
Murtaza G, Azhar S, Noreen S, Khan SA, Khan A, Nasir B, et al
. An evaluation of Pakistani pharmacy students knowledge of herbal medicines in Pakistan. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol 2012;6:221-4.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|This article has been cited by|
||Acute toxicity potential and impact on periodontal and periapical tissue of Pulp Out: A paste contained jatropha, sidaguri, and melittin
| ||Maria Tanumihardja, A.M. Windha, N. Musfirah, G.K. Punggawa, Andi Fatima, A.H.M. Nur Fadhila, Esfandiary, Nurhayaty Natsir, Husni Cangara, Lukman Muslimin |
| ||Toxicology Reports. 2022; 9: 1788 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Herbal supplements in Jordan: a cross-sectional survey of pharmacists’ perspectives and knowledge
| ||Banaz Jalil, Abdallah Y Naser, Jose M Prieto, Michael Heinrich |
| ||BMJ Open. 2022; 12(7): e057405 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|