Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences
Journal of Pharmacy And Bioallied Sciences Login  | Users Online: 1794  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
    Home | About us | Editorial board | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Past Issues | Instructions | Online submission




 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1750-1754  

Nonextraction correction of Class II malocclusion by pendulum appliance


1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to Be) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, SMBT Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Nashik, Maharashtra, India
3 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
4 General Dentist, JMF's ACPM Dental College and Hospital, Dhule, Maharashtra, India
5 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Smile Designers Dental Clinic and Orthodontic Care, Nashik, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission14-Mar-2021
Date of Decision26-Apr-2021
Date of Acceptance17-Apr-2021
Date of Web Publication10-Nov-2021

Correspondence Address:
Shivprasad Vasant Sonawane
Om Moungiri Bungalow, Hare Krishna Colony, Behind KKW Engg College, Panchavati, Nashik - 422 003, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_171_21

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


A 13-year-old female patient, presented with the chief complaint of forwardly placed upper front teeth. On examination and analysis of relevant records, she was diagnosed as an Angle's Class II malocclusion on a skeletal Class I base. It was decided to treat the patient with a nonextraction treatment approach with the help of maxillary molar distalization followed by fixed mechanotherapy.

Keywords: Class II malocclusion, molar distalization, nonextraction treatment, pendulum appliance


How to cite this article:
Jadhav PJ, Sonawane SV, Mahajan N, Chavan BG, Mahale PR, Pawar RA. Nonextraction correction of Class II malocclusion by pendulum appliance. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2021;13, Suppl S2:1750-4

How to cite this URL:
Jadhav PJ, Sonawane SV, Mahajan N, Chavan BG, Mahale PR, Pawar RA. Nonextraction correction of Class II malocclusion by pendulum appliance. J Pharm Bioall Sci [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 26];13, Suppl S2:1750-4. Available from: https://www.jpbsonline.org/text.asp?2021/13/6/1750/329995




   Introduction Top


Since the early 1980s various intra arch Molar Distalizing systems have been developed that aimed to minimize the reliance on the patient compliance.[1] Pendulum appliance being important part of this intraarch system is simple and efficient. It was introduced by HILGERS in 1992.[2] Since then, many variations have emerged and their clinical application has had great success.[3]

The distalization mechanism consists of bilateral helical spring made out of titanium molybdenum alloy. Unlike Jones jig, it does not have any coil springs; instead, it has 0.032 inches TMA springs which deliver a continuous force against the maxillary first molar producing 200 to 250 gms of force in a swimming arc movement from the midline, hence the name pendulum.[4]


   Case Report Top


Section I: Pretreatment assessment

History and clinical examination

A 13 year old female patient, presented with the chief complaint of forwardly placed upper front teeth.

Extraoral examination [Figure 1] revealed a Europrosopic facial form with convex profile, and low mandibular plane angle. The nasolabial angle was acute, and mentolabial sulcus was deep and potentially incompetent lips. The intraoral examination revealed [Figure 2] that patient exhibited Angle's Class II molar relationship and a Class II Division 1 incisor relationship with 10mm of overjet and 6mm overbite.
Figure 1: Extraoral pretreatment

Click here to view
Figure 2: Intraoral pretreatment

Click here to view


General radiographic examination

Panoramic radiographic examination [Figure 3], revealed the presence of all the permanent teeth and developing tooth germs of all the third molars except the mandibular left third molar.Cephalometric evaluation[5] [Figure 4] and [Table 1] revealed skeletal Class I jaw bases, horizontal growth pattern, decreased lower anterior facial height, increased overjet and overbite, convex profile, proclination of the maxillary incisors, average lower incisors and acute nasolabial angle.
Figure 3: Panoramic radiograph pretreatment

Click here to view
Figure 4: Lateral cephalogram pretreatment

Click here to view
Table 1: Pre- and post- treatment cephalometric values

Click here to view


Model analysis

Model analysis revealed 8 mm spacing in maxillary arch and 4.2 mm spacing in mandibular arch. Bolton analysis showed total maxillary tooth material excess and an anterior mandibular excess.

Diagnosis

The 13-year old growing female patient with Angle's Class II malocclusion on a skeletal Class I base with horizontal growth pattern, spacing in maxillary arch, proclination of maxillary incisors, average mandibular incisors, increased overjet and overbite, deep curve of Spee, with mandibular midline shifted to the right, convex profile, and acute nasolabial angle with decreased lower anterior facial height.

Treatment objectives

  • To establish bilateral Class I buccal segment relationship, ideal overjet and overbite.
  • To correct dental midlines, upper incisor Proclination, convex profile and normalize the acute nasolabial angle and achieve soft tissue balance and harmony.


Treatment plan

Appliance: Hilgers pendulum appliance followed by fixed mechanotherapy.

Special anchorage requirement: pendulum appliance and transpalatal arch.

Proposed retention strategy: Fixed lingual bonded retainers for the lower anteriors and the upper incisors and upper Hawley's retainer.

Section II: Treatment

After the fabrication of the appliance, it was cemented with the desired activation [Figure 5]. Molar distalization phase continued for 7 months. During the end stages of molar distalization, the anchorage taken from the second premolars was relieved to facilitate their distal movement [Figure 6]. After the pendulum appliance was removed, transpalatal arch was given on the same day.[3] Fixed mechanotherapy was started with MBT prescription 0.018′′ slot. After the initial alignment of maxillary teeth, 0.016′′ special plus Australian archwire was given, with E-chains to retract the maxillary premolars followed by maxillary canines [Figure 7]. Incisor retraction was done using closing loop fabricated in 0.016''* 0.022'' SS wire. [Figure 8]. In the mandibular arch, utility arch was given fabricated using 0.016'' * 0.016'' SS wire for incisor intrusion [Figure 9]. Space closure in both the arches was done. Upper and lower 0.017′′×0.025′′ NiTi archwires were given followed by 0.017′′×0.025′′ SS arch wires for finishing [Figure 10]. Subsequently 0.016′′ NiTi archwires were given along with elastics for the appropriate occlusal settling. Active treatment lasted for 1 years and 9 months after which fixed appliance was removed.
Figure 5: Pendulum appliance

Click here to view
Figure 6: Second premolars relieved

Click here to view
Figure 7: Individual canine retraction

Click here to view
Figure 8: Incisor retraction

Click here to view
Figure 9: Mandibular utility arch

Click here to view
Figure 10: Finishing stage completed

Click here to view


Interpretation of posttreatment cephalometric values

Posttreatment panoramic radiograph [Figure 13] showed root parallelism. Lateral cephalogram [Figure 14] showed both normal overjet and overbite. Cephalometric Superimposition summarizes the outcome of the treatment [Figure 15]. Soft tissue profile improved drastically due to the correction of the maxillary incisor proclination and increase in lower anterior facial height. Occlusal Indices [Table 2] showed satisfactory results.
Figure 11: Postdebonding Intraoral photographs

Click here to view
Figure 12: Postdebonding extraoral photographs

Click here to view
Figure 13: Panoramic radiograph posttreatment

Click here to view
Figure 14: Lateral cephalogram posttreatment

Click here to view
Figure 15: Superimposition

Click here to view
Table 2: Cephalometric analysis for sagittal changes

Click here to view


Critical appraisal

The posttreatment results achieved were highly satisfactory with good posterior occlusion [Figure 11] and excellent facial soft tissue balance and harmony [Figure 12]. The patient and parents were highly satisfied with the treatment result.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
   References Top

1.
Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997;67:249-60.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706-14.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Scuzzo G, Pisani F, Takemoto K. Maxillary molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliance. J Clin Orthod 1999;33:645-50.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ghosh J, Nanda RS. Evaluation of an intraoral maxillary molar distalization technique. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:639-46.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Kinzinger GS, Fritz UB, Sander FG, Diedrich PR. Efficiency of a pendulum appliance for molar distalization related to second and third molar eruption stage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:8-23.  Back to cited text no. 5
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8], [Figure 9], [Figure 10], [Figure 11], [Figure 12], [Figure 13], [Figure 14], [Figure 15]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Case Report
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed186    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded31    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal